The submitted paper to the conference must not be previously published, and not considered elsewhere for publication.
The editorial workflow for every manuscript submitted to the ICASEE-25 conference is outlined below, detailing the process of the peer review by at least 3 potential reviewers. The entire editorial workflow is facilitated through the online submission system. Upon submission, the manuscript undergoes an initial check by the journal's editorial office to verify that:
Following this verification, the manuscript is assigned to a Sectional Editor based on their subject expertise. The Sectional Editor conducts an initial assessment before inviting potential 3 reviewers to provide a peer-review report. (The Sectional Editor may reject a manuscript before review if deemed unsuitable.)
The selection of reviewers from the scientific committee members of the ICASEE-25 conference is critical for maintaining the conference's academic rigor and credibility. Leveraging the expertise of committee members, reviewers are systematically chosen based on their alignment with the conference's themes and topics. Diversity across academic backgrounds and geographical locations ensures inclusivity and comprehensive coverage. Careful consideration is given to impartiality and conflict of interest to uphold the integrity of the peer review process. The selection process optimizes reviewer expertise and fosters a transparent and rigorous evaluation process within the ICASEE-25 conference framework through collaboration between organizers, committee members, and stakeholders.
If the Sectional Editor recommends "Reject," the authors are sent any review reports received. They are informed that their manuscript will no longer be considered for publication in any of the publication partners in the conference.
If the Sectional Editor recommends "Needs Major Revision," the authors are notified to prepare and submit an updated version of their manuscript with the necessary changes suggested by the reviewers. This may involve collecting new data or making substantial revisions to the text. One or more original reviewers then reassess the manuscript before the Sectional Editor makes a new recommendation.
If the Sectional Editor recommends "Needs Minor Revision," the authors are notified to prepare and submit a final copy of their manuscript with the required minor changes suggested by the reviewers. Once the Sectional Editor is satisfied with the final manuscript, optionally seeking further advice from one or more reviewers, the Academic Editor can recommend "Publish without Alterations."
If the Sectional Editor recommends "Publish without Modifications," the manuscript undergoes a final check by the publication partners’ editorial office to ensure adherence to the publication partners’ guidelines and policies in both the content and review process. Upon completion, the authors are notified of the manuscript's acceptance.
Welcome to the Eurasian Journal of Science and Engineering (EAJSE), was founded in 2016 by Tishk International University, a distinguished platform at the lead of science and engineering exploration. The journal publishes, in English language only, high-quality Research Articles covering of pure and applied sciences, engineering disciplines, and their interdisciplinary applications. Also, the journal welcomes the Survey Articles in every pure and applied sciences and engineering fields.
EAJSE is a dynamic, globally recognized hub for cutting-edge research, promoting cross-disciplinary interactions. Upholding the highest academic standards, it features a rigorous double-blind peer-review process, ensuring publication of groundbreaking contributions. Committed to open access principles, EAJSE maximizes research impact and fosters collaboration within the global scientific and engineering communities. The Journal is published biannually (June and December) with one volume and two issues per volume in both print and online versions. The online version is free to access and download.
EAJSE:
1 volume per year, 2 issues per volume
Approx. 700 pages per vol.
Format A4: 21.0 x 29.7 cm
ISSN (Print): 2414-5629
ISSN (Electronic): 2414-5602
For inquiries, manuscript submissions, and collaborative opportunities, please reach out to the editorial team at [email protected].
Submit your manuscript through the submission system https://eajse.tiu.edu.iq/submit/. Then the corresponding/submitter author will receive an automatic email including your paper details and a specific manuscript number within 24 hours. The manuscript must be submitted in MS-WORD or LaTeX file format. Before submitting your manuscript, authors are advised to follow the Author Guidelines. Manuscripts not conforming to these guidelines will be returned to the author(s).
Submission Acknowledgement: When you submit a manuscript, the editor or editorial assistant sends a confirmation e-mail to the submitter author within one to two working days, and a manuscript number will be mailed to the corresponding author. If you fail to receive this confirmation, please check your bulk email box or contact the editorial assistant.
Basic Review: The editor or editorial assistant determines whether the manuscript fits the journal's focus and scope. Next, a check for the similarity rate is done using Cross-check, powered by authenticating. Any manuscripts out of the journal's scope or containing plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, are rejected. Manuscripts out of the journal's scope are rejected. Articles published fully or partly in other publications/websites are not reviewed or accepted.
Peer Review: We use a double-blind system for peer review; both reviewers' and authors' identities remain anonymous. The submitted manuscript will be reviewed by at least three experts: one editorial staff member as well as one to three external reviewers. The review process may take two to 3 months.
The decision is Made: The decision to accept an article is based on the reports written by the reviewers as well as the average score in the referee evaluation form filled by reviewers. The reviewers grade a submitted manuscript on a scale of 1 to 5. To be accepted for publication, the manuscript must obtain an average score of not less than 2.5. If differences of opinion occur between reviewers, the editor or editorial assistant will weigh all comments and arrive at a balanced decision based on all comments, or a second round of peer review may be initiated.
Notification of the Result of Review: The result of the reviewers will be sent to the corresponding author. Based on a minor or major revision, the author will be given a limited time to send a feedback report according to the reviewer's comments and some comments of the editorial board. Then the editorial board will work on it to make the final decision.
Submission is Accepted: If the submission is accepted, the authors revise the paper according to the editorial board's notifications. If English proofreading is required, journal management may ask to send the paper to the proofreading service of the journal.
The following list is about how we will distribute the products to the readers: