TERRORISM AND THE RULE OF LAW: Analysis of International Law Perspectives
Doi: 10.23918/ilic2020.58
Keywords: Rule of Law – Global Terrorism – International Law – International Conventions.
PROCEEDINGS OF 5th INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ISSUES CONFERENCE (ILIC2020)
Faculty of Law/ Tishk International University
Date: 12th November 2020
Venue: Kurdistan Region Erbil
ISBN:9789922903651
_____________________________________________________________________________
Dr. Neville D’Cunha
International Relations and Diplomacy Department-TISHK International University-Erbil, Iraq
_____________________________________________________________________________
Methodology: The analytical approach employed in this study falls broadly under the mantle of discourse analysis. On this epistemological foundation and adopting an interpretive logic, the discourse analytic technique employed in this article proceeded in two stages. The first stage entailed a close examination of texts representative of the ‘Terrorism-International Law’ discourse, particularly those by actors presumed to be authoritative or authorized speakers of the dominant discourse. As such, the primary units of analysis or ‘data’ for this research included: (1) official speeches and documents of senior policy makers; (2) books, articles and reports by major thinktanks, public intellectuals and journalists; and (3) academic books and scholarly articles in the core terrorism studies and international law. The second stage of the research involved subjecting the findings of the textual analysis to interpretation. It examined how terrorism and international law relate to each other and the challenges they pose for each other.
Outcomes: Emerging from the data were specific themes that are central to this study. First, international law matters in the foundational way of setting up the institutions, the organizations, and the procedures through which states communicate and create counter-terrorism strategies. Second, international law matters in the sense that it creates legitimacy. It creates sense of expectations and reliance about how terrorism will be handled, and that factors into the reputation of states; it affects their calculation of self-interest. And finally, most importantly, international law matters because it creates rules about how states should behave with each other in the event of interstate terrorism, including the most fundamental matters of jus ad bellum and jus in bello. It tells states what they can and cannot do in a number of the most important circumstances. In conclusion, what I say about the pervasive nature of terrorism is that law is not only relevant, it becomes most relevant in these trying circumstances. These times of transition and trauma can offer an opportunity to strengthen international legal norms and combat international terrorism.
_____________________________________________________________________________
References:
Alexander, Y. (2017a). Terrorism and the Rule of Law: Selected Perspectives. Available from www.terrorismelectronicjournal.org; www.iucts.org.
Alexander, Y. (2017b). The Role of Diplomacy in Combating Terrorism. Available from www.terrorismelectronicjournal.org; www.iucts.org.
Ballin, E.H. (2018). Restoring trust in the rule of law. ASSER research paper 2018-01.
Bode, I. & Huelss, H. (2019). Introduction to the Special Section: The Autonomisation of Weapons
Systems: Challenges to International Relations. Global Policy, Vol. 10. Issue 3. September.
Bergeron, J. (2013) Transnational Organised Crime and International Security. The RUSI Journal, 158:2, 6-9.
Dixon, M. & McCorquodale, R. (2003). Cases & Materials on International Law. (4th Edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dragu, T. & Polborn, M. (2014). The Rule of Law in the Fight Against Terrorism. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 58, No. 2 (April), pp. 511-525.
Dunlap, C.J. (2008). Lawfare Today: A Perspective, Yale Journal of International Affairs. http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5892&context=faculty_scholarship.
Fiss, O. (2006). The War Against Terrorism and the Rule of Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 26, No. 2 (2006), pp. 235–256.
Gegout, C. (2013) The International Criminal Court: limits, potential and conditions for the promotion of justice and peace. Third World Quarterly, 34:5, 800-818.
Institute for Economics & Peace (IEP). (2019). Global Terrorism Index 2019: Measuring the Impact of Terrorism, Sydney, November 2019. Available from: http://visionofhumanity.org/reports (accessed 04-03-2020).
Jackson, R. (2007). Constructing Enemies: Islamic Terrorism’ in Political and Academic Discourse. Government and Opposition, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 394-426.
Kaldor, M. (2013). In Defence of New Wars. Stability, 2(1): 4, pp. 1-16.
Murphy, C.C. (2019). Terrorism and Transnational Law: Rules of Law under Conditions of Globalisation. Available from: bristol.ac.uk/law/research/legal-research –papers.
Sadat, L.N. (2004). Terrorism and the Rule of Law. Washington University Global Studies Law Review, Vol. 3:135.
Sinai, J., Fuller, J. & Seal, T. (2019). Effectiveness in Counter-Terrorism and Countering Violent Extremism A Literature Review. Perspectives on Terrorism, Vol. 13, No. 6 (December), pp. 90-108.
United Nations and World Bank. (2018). Pathways for Peace: Inclusive Approaches to Preventing Violent Conflict. Washington D.C. World Bank.
Waters, M. A. (2010). “Lawfare” in the War on Terrorism: A Reclamation Project, 43 Case W. Res. J. Int’l L.327. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol43/iss1/20.